Everything in your case should be clear, logical and supported by facts. No, this does not mean that your case will be thin (for an O-1 visa, for example, there are approx. 500 pages of documents). But yes, you can leave out something that is not directly related to the case.
We help to sort out the important bits from the unimportant ones and prepare the case so that the immigration officers do not get a headache.
Often, when working on documents and proofs of criteria, clients themselves cannot formulate their “uniqueness” and “value”.
Each document should clearly spell out and prove what exactly makes you "extraordinary". It's time to forget about the imposter syndrome and start praising yourself!
We are also ready to help with this, focusing on your strengths. And our partners can competently re-think your social media, increase the number of mentions in the media and do everything to make your case shine.
It is not enough to say that your accomplishments are "important" to your area of expertise. Everything must be supported by documents, stats and so on. It is wrong to think that the officer himself will study the specifics of your field/profession: he must receive an exhaustive package of documents.
For example, if you claim that your salary is higher than the market, you need to prove this with statistics for your region.
Be clear about what you did in your previous jobs and what you plan to do in the US.
It is important to give the officer enough facts, but not to bury him in mountains of unnecessary information. Your goal is to clearly state why you meet each selected criterion.
Translation of documents is included in our services.
They should detail your strengths and specific talents and skills, and not rely on just general phrases like “he is a highly skilled professional”.
We know which letters are read to the end by immigration officers and which are sent to the trash.
Believe it or not, immigration officers can easily Google you. And if they can't find anything substantial, your case will be in jeopardy. Work on your social media presence, score publications in the media and so on: it will be useful for the case and in general for your career.
Publications in the media should be about you or your project, but not be overly promotional. An article published “as an advertisement” will not be suitable for your case.
The entire article must be attached to the case, and not just the title or an except.
The articles about you can't be too old or too fresh. This rule is pretty vague, but it definitely means that articles cannot be written literally before submitting a case.
Articles must be published in registered media. Blogs and Telegram channels will not work.
You must have documents that prove that you really were a judge and why you were entrusted this role.
You must show that you really took an active part as a judge.
If a wide profile of specialists was allowed to judge, this will confuse the immigration officer: it is important for him to understand why you were chosen.
Scientific articles have many formatting and formatting rules. Make sure yours are up to the standard.
A scientific article cannot be written for a wide range of people. Its target audience is professionals from your industry.
Your name must not only be mentioned in the material, you must be credited as the author. This can be confirmed by a letter from the editor.
If everyone can get into it, your membership will not impress the immigration officer.
You must attach both documents relating to the association itself (e.g. articles of association) and the ones related to your participation (membership certificate, your profile page).
If you are a PR manager who is in the Union of Journalists, then it's irrelevant for your case.
You must be a member of the organization at the time of the visa application.
Awards received by the entire organization will not work.
What merits and talents allowed you to receive these prizes?
If the award is not creating any buzz, it will not be suitable for your case.
"Employee of the Month" won't work.
You need to prove that you have brought value not only to your clients or customers, but to the entire industry.
Letters of recommendation should not only praise your skills and talents, but also articulate in detail exactly how you changed your industry.
If you have invented something, then you definitely need to tell who and how uses your invention in their work.
It is logical that publications about your contribution should be available publicly. So it is better to attach only those data that the immigration officer can easily verify.
First you need to prove that the organization you belong to really has a "distinguished reputation". It's not enough to submit internal documents: you need to present an independent expert assessment (articles, reports, statistics, etc).
Immigration officers love facts. Letters of praise from colleagues will not be enough: you need to show documents, certificates and reports that describe your contribution to the work of the organization.
It is not enough to write what position you held in the organization. You need to describe how exactly your activity and your unique talents helped it to reach new heights.
They are the ones who can confirm and describe the importance of your contribution. Letters must be submitted on official letterhead. Also note that immigration officers do not like to see personal emails in said letters and prefer the corporate ones.
It is not enough to write that you have a high salary. You need to show that it is higher than that of your colleagues. It is mandatory to bring supporting public data, statistics and so on.
If you are a highly paid pianist, then you need to attach salary information for other pianists, not any musicians.
It is not enough to simply convert your salary into US dollars and compare the resulting amount with American salaries. Your income needs to be analyzed in the context of your country.
Learn your chances or book a free consultation with our team to learn more about the USA visas.
